2. Evaluating citizen science: Expanding assessment criteria for research rewards

This module delves into the assessment criteria for CS, extending beyond the conventional reward systems typically associated with scientific research. Throughout the session, learners will explore more expansive assessment models, delving into discussions aimed at identifying additional or supplementary criteria specifically tailored to the unique nature of CS projects. Upon completion of this training module, learners will emerge with a thorough and comprehensive understanding of the intricacies involved in evaluating and rewarding contributions made within the realm of CS. This newfound knowledge and expertise will empower them to effectively recognize, appreciate, and advocate for the substantial value that CS may bring to RPOs. It equips learners with the tools to not only assess but also strategically promote and endorse the importance of CS within their research communities and organisations.

Module description: 

What?

How?

Why?

Introduction to the training module

Providing a link between the previous training module and the need for comprehensive evaluation and assessment related to CS

Explaining to the learners why this section is relevant - to link policy-making and strategy to assessment criteria

Challenges in evaluating CS

Explaining why CS assessments need to be broader than usual assessments in science including diverse objectives and project types, issues around data quality and reliability, and subjective impacts

Demonstrating the need for more comprehensive assessment models

Assessing citizen science to evaluate its quality, impact, and effectiveness

Elaborating scientific, societal, and learner impacts, including data quality, research contribution, environmental and societal benefits, awareness and education, engagement, and empowerment

Giving learners an understanding of the many different quality criteria that are relevant for CS assessment

The Citizen Science Impact Assessment Framework (CSIAF)

Explaining the six guiding principles of CSIAF: 1) Acknowledging a variety of purposes of citizen science impact assessment, 2) Non-linear conceptualisation of impact journeys to overcome impact silos, 3) Comprehensive impact assessment methods and information sources, 4) Moving beyond absolute impact, 5) Fostering comparison of impact assessment results across citizen science projects, and 6) Cumulative enhancement of the framework over time

Equipping learners with a set of foundational principles to support thorough and effective evaluation in the realm of CS

MICS: Measuring the impact of CS

Describing the five impact domains included in the MICS framework, including examples of the indicators proposed



Slide available in slide deck.